Dr. J the "rose" has a mind like an "Einstein" and her conclusive evidence cuts the lies and liars to pieces.
To say she is a masterpiece is an understatement to say the least. Should I wax long about her? No. Everyone knows I am right about her. I am sure she was an amazing little girl, a fabulous teen and now a woman of refined mental excellence that slays me in the first degree.
She is one difficult to follow for me based on the reality of mental finesse and her easy grasp of complexities but she is sure easy to adore and have feelings for. Excellence always blazes a trail for the truth and with her that is a given. Keep on gal, you are amazing.
Jessica stated she has all the relevant virology & immunology to understand Covid jabs so it is huge disappointment in 2024 to see transition from years of misnaming them vaccines to injectable products. Every bench biologist, virologist, vaccine developer & med school has used mRNA Transfection and knew this is what was given to the public w lie it's a vaccine because syringe delivery looks the same.
Lots more folks would have said NO if the high profile voices claiming to be front line resistance, medical freedom & informed consent had used "mRNA transfection" to corr5ectly name the deadly jabs before roll out & ever after. Sadly it's 2024 and refusal to adopt decades old scientific terminology still confuses the issue.
It was always criminally negligent to transfect people even mRNA in its purest form is foreign protein that an immune system will attack and destroy. Biotech death of Jesse Gelsinger 1999 when a fatal defective gene was "repaired" by transfection but perfect in CRISPR sequence is not self by Mother Nature's rules.
First rule of immunology is the system recognizing the difference between self & non-self proteins and to destroy any foreign invaders. The LNP and DNA and assorted contaminants add complicating factors but it's deadly by design as brilliant Mike Yeadon explains.
I'm kind of shooting from the hip here, and have usually been conveniently thinking of all things 'non-mRNA transfection' lumped together.
. .
To the best of my memory (2 years readership) Dr. Rose was always careful to call these non-vaccines shots, jabs, etc. Might the term 'injectable products' have been a collective shorthand for either the dissimilar mechanism of one of the brands, &/or the multiplicity of troublesome ingredients found in all of the products?
. .
Scientists could take this in stride, but would .
the general public have bothered to parse the meaning of
mRNA transfection, and then absorb the names and differentiate the harms of the other ingredients?
In the public's case, it may have been better to tentatively leave the devil in the details and continue with the overall warning.
The players knew the fix was in and went ahead as murderers one and all because of their greed. Babies, little children, men and women were murdered by idolators possessed by love of the dollar. These will find their god the devil always gets his dues.
"n the public's case, it may have been better to tentatively leave the devil in the details and continue with the overall warning."
Most absurd logic ever.. we want to warn you about decades old failed & dangerous technology but won't say transfection because it's better to misname it as a thing most people trust.. then when harms accumulate focus on random elements that magnify the harms that were always known to be transfection effects. Idiotic argument to cover for lying and misleading us as too dumb to grasp what they have wisdom to know. pfft!
Please note that in my last line I used the word "tentatively".
. .
I do not and never have approved of calling these products vaccines
(a term the public believes it understands),
nor do I condone coverups and lying.
. .
When explaining a new idea to anyone unaware, it works best to start where they are and guide them to where you want them to be.
. .
The general public is not too dumb to grasp mRNA transcription, they are unprepared. And, propaganda has given the term "vaccine" a head start (hence "vaxxines"). "Injectable products", while not explaining mRNA, includes troublesome ingredients, maliciously or negligently used. It simply groups and differentiates them all from (the publicly accepted) vaccines. It's "shorthand".
. .
Bringing the public to understanding mRNA is only the 1st step.
To grasp our predicament,, they need at least (or most) an inkling of how mRNA fails through tampering or negligence and what the resulting harms/causes/remedies are.
. .
The guidance, remedies and mitigations will be developed by scientists, with or without public understanding of their vocabulary.
Accurate terms can be introduced and explained then.
Couldn't disagree more.. without the proper terms one cannot understand the concepts.. we are not toddlers w measured explanations for facts of life and beyond syringe delivery the two products are no more alike & suited to identical purpose than soup & motor oil that bot come in cans.
Since Nuremberg Trials the law demands informed consent for any medical procedure w individual right to refuse. Before you can give informed consent you need to be informed. With greater ease than official sources sold the idea Ivermectin was horse dewormer & chorus of opposition that pushed back genuine public advocates should have said these are nothing like vaccines.
These are called mRNA TRANSFECTIONS decades old failed & dangerous product seeking a market. These trick your body into being its own vaccine factory w unknown dose for unknown duration & unknown distribution.. what we do know is immune systems NEVER tolerate foreign proteins.. allergies are one sign of intolerance we all understand.. Transfection was deadly by design & refusing to add basic product info is inexcusable in 2024 feels malevolent.
Mike Yeadon has been repeating this since May 2020...
I'm NOT against defining and explaining mRNA science.
. .
Public understanding of our predicament runs from none to full, aside from total disbeleif. Even circumstantial evidence of shot-related deaths is enough for some to reject the shots.
They're good with that. Done.
Others want down-to-the-molecule proof. Give it to them.
In between are millions of people to protect with different types and amounts of information. It's useless and wasteful to overwhelm some of them with more information than they need or can absorb to avoid, survive or recover from harm. Save more for those who need more.
. .
In a burning building, when someone yells FIRE!. those who 1) hear it,
2) understand the language, 3) believe it and 4) are able to find and use the exits, will flee to safety.,
Those who don't hear, understand, believe, or can't find/use the exits, AND DON'T BECOME AWARE OF THE FIRE BY OTHER MEANS may suffer or die (infants, deaf, handicapped, animals). Focus on that group's special needs. No one in either group will likely ask
how hot the fire was.
. .
Never let perfection stand in the way of good.
(But keep it handy for when it's needed)
, .
Your last response contained many things I agree with.
I just want to focus on matching communication
to varied needs and abilities. We're not all scientists.
Again,when explaining a new idea to anyone unaware, it works best to start where they are and guide them to where you
There needs to be a study, all sort illness between unvaxxed and vaxxed separate,
Right now papers are being discussed on all causes death, and we need to know it is well over normal now,
Dr John Campbell has and shares awesome data,he is on utube.
My opinion is all the data collection is all being done in fear if government trying to stop the sharing of it, government should be at the forefront of the collection, problem solving, and open to learn from what really happen is so important,
The fundamental driver behind the entire covid vaccine push is money. Doctors, Gov't public health bureaucracies, most doctors, politicians and media advertizers have all been well rewarded. Secondarily, is the left wing penchant for control of the narrative and impinging on
basic freedoms, undermining everything from bodily autonomy to freedom of speech and the pursuit of individual happiness.
This is very disturbing to me that One Health is being pushed in Canada. I can see how this will diminish the care of both people and animals. I can also see how this bring further climate emergency policies.
We have not seen anything like this before , but always existed
We are now awake in spite of wokeness, we are seeing it now, we are at war, but not like anything before, a spiritual war
We are going in with instinct, common sense, trust, hope and what ever or whoever you put your faith in to do the good thing
We are in real times, "THE AGE OF AQUARIUS AND ALSO REALLY LOOKS LIKE WHAT THE BIBLE CALLS REVELATION
EVERYTHING IS BECOMMING CLEAR AND I STAND WITH YOU,
SPEAK YOUR TRUTH, STAND STRONG WITH LOVE
AND COMPASSION, AND YOU CANT FIX STUPID SO WALK AWAY FROM ANYONE WHO WANTS TO HURT AND OR DESTROY TRUTH AND USE YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND POWER TO HELP THE GOOD PEOPLE
JESSICA,I AM A PAID SUBSCRIBER WHO NEEDS HELP WITH AN APPEAL WITH THE FRAUDULENT VACCINE INJURY SUPPORT PROGRAM. i HAVE BEEN DISABLED FOR 3 YEARS.THEY WONT ACCEPT ANY EVIDENCE NOT PROVIDED DIRECTLY FROM AN MD WHO KNOWS ONLY SAFE AND EFFECTIVE MANTRA.i CAN'T EVEN PROVIDE DOCTOR NOTES OR DIALOG. THEY HAVE NOT RECEIVED DOCTORS NOTES FROM IMMEDIATELY AFTER MY 3RD MANDATED SHOT.OF THOUSANDS OF CLAIMS THE HAVE ONLY APPROVED AROUND 2O!THEY ACKNOWLEDGE MY SYMPTOMS, BUT HAVE NOT RECEIVED THE 3 MONTHS MD NOTES AFTER 3 YEARS.THEY CLAIM THERE IS NO SPIKOPATHY IN THE MEDICAL LITERATURE HOPEFULLY, AT LEAST SOMEONE WILL BRING THIS TRAVESTY TO YOUR ATTENTION EVEN IF YOU CAN'T HELP LAWRENCE JEAN
Her work is online. Refer the fools to a real expert but get permission to use it first or use a publication giving reference and credit to the author and the mag.
Thank you Dr. Rose! I also just listened to a podcast of Dr. Jack Kruse talking with Andrew Hunerman. Are you familiar with Dr. Kruse's work? My mind is blown!
Dr. J the "rose" has a mind like an "Einstein" and her conclusive evidence cuts the lies and liars to pieces.
To say she is a masterpiece is an understatement to say the least. Should I wax long about her? No. Everyone knows I am right about her. I am sure she was an amazing little girl, a fabulous teen and now a woman of refined mental excellence that slays me in the first degree.
Always Edward
She is one difficult to follow for me based on the reality of mental finesse and her easy grasp of complexities but she is sure easy to adore and have feelings for. Excellence always blazes a trail for the truth and with her that is a given. Keep on gal, you are amazing.
Jessica stated she has all the relevant virology & immunology to understand Covid jabs so it is huge disappointment in 2024 to see transition from years of misnaming them vaccines to injectable products. Every bench biologist, virologist, vaccine developer & med school has used mRNA Transfection and knew this is what was given to the public w lie it's a vaccine because syringe delivery looks the same.
Lots more folks would have said NO if the high profile voices claiming to be front line resistance, medical freedom & informed consent had used "mRNA transfection" to corr5ectly name the deadly jabs before roll out & ever after. Sadly it's 2024 and refusal to adopt decades old scientific terminology still confuses the issue.
It was always criminally negligent to transfect people even mRNA in its purest form is foreign protein that an immune system will attack and destroy. Biotech death of Jesse Gelsinger 1999 when a fatal defective gene was "repaired" by transfection but perfect in CRISPR sequence is not self by Mother Nature's rules.
https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html
First rule of immunology is the system recognizing the difference between self & non-self proteins and to destroy any foreign invaders. The LNP and DNA and assorted contaminants add complicating factors but it's deadly by design as brilliant Mike Yeadon explains.
https://rumble.com/v4kc73l-dr-mike-yeadon.html
I'm kind of shooting from the hip here, and have usually been conveniently thinking of all things 'non-mRNA transfection' lumped together.
. .
To the best of my memory (2 years readership) Dr. Rose was always careful to call these non-vaccines shots, jabs, etc. Might the term 'injectable products' have been a collective shorthand for either the dissimilar mechanism of one of the brands, &/or the multiplicity of troublesome ingredients found in all of the products?
. .
Scientists could take this in stride, but would .
the general public have bothered to parse the meaning of
mRNA transfection, and then absorb the names and differentiate the harms of the other ingredients?
In the public's case, it may have been better to tentatively leave the devil in the details and continue with the overall warning.
The players knew the fix was in and went ahead as murderers one and all because of their greed. Babies, little children, men and women were murdered by idolators possessed by love of the dollar. These will find their god the devil always gets his dues.
"n the public's case, it may have been better to tentatively leave the devil in the details and continue with the overall warning."
Most absurd logic ever.. we want to warn you about decades old failed & dangerous technology but won't say transfection because it's better to misname it as a thing most people trust.. then when harms accumulate focus on random elements that magnify the harms that were always known to be transfection effects. Idiotic argument to cover for lying and misleading us as too dumb to grasp what they have wisdom to know. pfft!
Please note that in my last line I used the word "tentatively".
. .
I do not and never have approved of calling these products vaccines
(a term the public believes it understands),
nor do I condone coverups and lying.
. .
When explaining a new idea to anyone unaware, it works best to start where they are and guide them to where you want them to be.
. .
The general public is not too dumb to grasp mRNA transcription, they are unprepared. And, propaganda has given the term "vaccine" a head start (hence "vaxxines"). "Injectable products", while not explaining mRNA, includes troublesome ingredients, maliciously or negligently used. It simply groups and differentiates them all from (the publicly accepted) vaccines. It's "shorthand".
. .
Bringing the public to understanding mRNA is only the 1st step.
To grasp our predicament,, they need at least (or most) an inkling of how mRNA fails through tampering or negligence and what the resulting harms/causes/remedies are.
. .
The guidance, remedies and mitigations will be developed by scientists, with or without public understanding of their vocabulary.
Accurate terms can be introduced and explained then.
Couldn't disagree more.. without the proper terms one cannot understand the concepts.. we are not toddlers w measured explanations for facts of life and beyond syringe delivery the two products are no more alike & suited to identical purpose than soup & motor oil that bot come in cans.
Since Nuremberg Trials the law demands informed consent for any medical procedure w individual right to refuse. Before you can give informed consent you need to be informed. With greater ease than official sources sold the idea Ivermectin was horse dewormer & chorus of opposition that pushed back genuine public advocates should have said these are nothing like vaccines.
These are called mRNA TRANSFECTIONS decades old failed & dangerous product seeking a market. These trick your body into being its own vaccine factory w unknown dose for unknown duration & unknown distribution.. what we do know is immune systems NEVER tolerate foreign proteins.. allergies are one sign of intolerance we all understand.. Transfection was deadly by design & refusing to add basic product info is inexcusable in 2024 feels malevolent.
Mike Yeadon has been repeating this since May 2020...
Deadly by Design https://rumble.com/v4kc73l-dr-mike-yeadon.html
I'm NOT against defining and explaining mRNA science.
. .
Public understanding of our predicament runs from none to full, aside from total disbeleif. Even circumstantial evidence of shot-related deaths is enough for some to reject the shots.
They're good with that. Done.
Others want down-to-the-molecule proof. Give it to them.
In between are millions of people to protect with different types and amounts of information. It's useless and wasteful to overwhelm some of them with more information than they need or can absorb to avoid, survive or recover from harm. Save more for those who need more.
. .
In a burning building, when someone yells FIRE!. those who 1) hear it,
2) understand the language, 3) believe it and 4) are able to find and use the exits, will flee to safety.,
Those who don't hear, understand, believe, or can't find/use the exits, AND DON'T BECOME AWARE OF THE FIRE BY OTHER MEANS may suffer or die (infants, deaf, handicapped, animals). Focus on that group's special needs. No one in either group will likely ask
how hot the fire was.
. .
Never let perfection stand in the way of good.
(But keep it handy for when it's needed)
, .
Your last response contained many things I agree with.
I just want to focus on matching communication
to varied needs and abilities. We're not all scientists.
Again,when explaining a new idea to anyone unaware, it works best to start where they are and guide them to where you
want them to be. (often in stages)
Steve Kirsch has over a million records from Chezchia about who took what mRNA vaccine and when. And who did not.
There needs to be a study, all sort illness between unvaxxed and vaxxed separate,
Right now papers are being discussed on all causes death, and we need to know it is well over normal now,
Dr John Campbell has and shares awesome data,he is on utube.
My opinion is all the data collection is all being done in fear if government trying to stop the sharing of it, government should be at the forefront of the collection, problem solving, and open to learn from what really happen is so important,
The lack of leadership is very concerning.
The fundamental driver behind the entire covid vaccine push is money. Doctors, Gov't public health bureaucracies, most doctors, politicians and media advertizers have all been well rewarded. Secondarily, is the left wing penchant for control of the narrative and impinging on
basic freedoms, undermining everything from bodily autonomy to freedom of speech and the pursuit of individual happiness.
Not money, that's a bi product. Sascha Latypova Due Diligence and Art and Katherine Watt's Bailiwick News 🙏
Thank you Tom.
Jess, You are a GIFT to Humanity!
Thank you , excellent. 🤗
https://news.uoguelph.ca/2024/08/first-national-one-health-training-program-to-prepare-leaders-for-next-pandemic/
This is very disturbing to me that One Health is being pushed in Canada. I can see how this will diminish the care of both people and animals. I can also see how this bring further climate emergency policies.
We have not seen anything like this before , but always existed
We are now awake in spite of wokeness, we are seeing it now, we are at war, but not like anything before, a spiritual war
We are going in with instinct, common sense, trust, hope and what ever or whoever you put your faith in to do the good thing
We are in real times, "THE AGE OF AQUARIUS AND ALSO REALLY LOOKS LIKE WHAT THE BIBLE CALLS REVELATION
EVERYTHING IS BECOMMING CLEAR AND I STAND WITH YOU,
SPEAK YOUR TRUTH, STAND STRONG WITH LOVE
AND COMPASSION, AND YOU CANT FIX STUPID SO WALK AWAY FROM ANYONE WHO WANTS TO HURT AND OR DESTROY TRUTH AND USE YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND POWER TO HELP THE GOOD PEOPLE
JESSICA,I AM A PAID SUBSCRIBER WHO NEEDS HELP WITH AN APPEAL WITH THE FRAUDULENT VACCINE INJURY SUPPORT PROGRAM. i HAVE BEEN DISABLED FOR 3 YEARS.THEY WONT ACCEPT ANY EVIDENCE NOT PROVIDED DIRECTLY FROM AN MD WHO KNOWS ONLY SAFE AND EFFECTIVE MANTRA.i CAN'T EVEN PROVIDE DOCTOR NOTES OR DIALOG. THEY HAVE NOT RECEIVED DOCTORS NOTES FROM IMMEDIATELY AFTER MY 3RD MANDATED SHOT.OF THOUSANDS OF CLAIMS THE HAVE ONLY APPROVED AROUND 2O!THEY ACKNOWLEDGE MY SYMPTOMS, BUT HAVE NOT RECEIVED THE 3 MONTHS MD NOTES AFTER 3 YEARS.THEY CLAIM THERE IS NO SPIKOPATHY IN THE MEDICAL LITERATURE HOPEFULLY, AT LEAST SOMEONE WILL BRING THIS TRAVESTY TO YOUR ATTENTION EVEN IF YOU CAN'T HELP LAWRENCE JEAN
Her work is online. Refer the fools to a real expert but get permission to use it first or use a publication giving reference and credit to the author and the mag.
I enjoyed hearing Jess' thoughts about feminism late in the interview.
Thank you Dr. Rose! I also just listened to a podcast of Dr. Jack Kruse talking with Andrew Hunerman. Are you familiar with Dr. Kruse's work? My mind is blown!
Another great interview Dr Jessica Rose 🌹 aways nice see the face and voice behind all your hard work 😊👍💕
Anyone have any links/research to the P17 gene, the jabbed and turbo cancers please? Tia 🙏